Ingredient list › PPG-2 Myristyl Ether Propionate

Does PPG-2 Myristyl Ether Propionate clog pores?

Quick answer: It can — PPG-2 Myristyl Ether Propionate carries a moderate pore-clogging risk (rated 3/5), so watch it if you break out easily, especially when it is high on the ingredient list. It is also a common fungal-acne (Malassezia) trigger.

3/5
Moderate pore-clogging risk
Comedogenicity scale: 0 = won't clog pores, 5 = very likely to clog pores.
012345

PPG-2 Myristyl Ether Propionate has a moderate chance of clogging pores. Plenty of people tolerate it, but if you break out easily it is worth watching — particularly if it is one of the first few ingredients listed.

Check a full ingredient list →

What is PPG-2 Myristyl Ether Propionate?

PPG-2 Myristyl Ether Propionate is an emollient ester that gives products a smooth, silky feel. You'll most often see it in foundations, primers, sunscreens, lotions and anything with a light, silky slip.

Fungal-acne (Malassezia) safe? No — this is a common Malassezia (fungal acne) trigger, so avoid it if you have fungal acne. Check a whole product for fungal-acne triggers →

Is PPG-2 Myristyl Ether Propionate comedogenic?

PPG-2 Myristyl Ether Propionate has a comedogenicity rating of 3/5 — moderate pore-clogging risk. Remember that where an ingredient sits in the list matters: PPG-2 Myristyl Ether Propionate near the top means a higher concentration and more impact than the same ingredient near the end.

Acne-safe alternatives to PPG-2 Myristyl Ether Propionate

If PPG-2 Myristyl Ether Propionate breaks you out, these lower-rated ester options are far less likely to clog pores:

How we rate comedogenicity — and its limits

The 0–5 comedogenicity scale comes from dermatology research that measured how much individual ingredients clogged pores, originally using the rabbit-ear assay (Fulton et al., 1984). A rating reflects an ingredient's potential to clog pores at high concentration — not a guarantee that any finished product will break you out.

That distinction matters. A later review (Draelos & DiNardo, 2006) found that a single ingredient's comedogenic score does not reliably predict how a complete formula behaves on real skin: concentration, the rest of the formula, and your own skin all change the result. So read PPG-2 Myristyl Ether Propionate's 3/5 as a risk signal — most useful when the ingredient sits near the top of the list — rather than a verdict on one specific product.

AcneSafeCheck compiles published comedogenicity ratings and dermatology references into one searchable database. It is educational, not a lab test of your specific product, and not medical advice.

References

  1. Fulton JE Jr, Pay SR, Fulton JE III. Comedogenicity of current therapeutic products, cosmetics, and ingredients in the rabbit ear. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1984;10(1):96–105. PubMed
  2. Draelos ZD, DiNardo JC. A re-evaluation of the comedogenicity concept. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54(3):507–512. PubMed
  3. American Academy of Dermatology. Acne: causes, treatment and skin-care guidance. aad.org

By Mitchell Zandwijken · Rated against the published comedogenicity references above · Last updated July 2026.

Note: Informational only, not medical advice. Real-world effects depend on concentration, the full formula and your individual skin.